Pages

May 12, 2012

Beaumont, California Woman Blinded for 'Contempt of Cop'


Thanks to police officer Enoch Clark, Beaumont, California resident Monique Hernandez will never see her ten-year-old daughter again.

On February 21, Clark conducted a traffic stop involving Hernandez, who was suspected of drunk driving. When Clark attempted to handcuff her, Hernandez resisted. The officer responded by using a JPX device -- a weapon that uses a gunpowder charge to fire a stream of pepper spray at roughly 400 miles an hour.

The JPX weapon is designed for use at a distance of 6 to 15 feet, and training presentations depict it being deployed against aggressive, armed assailants. Promotional literature for the JPX weapon -- which isn't categorized as a firearm, because it doesn't fire a projectile -- boasts of "devastating stopping power." The payload of weaponized OC spray is propelled over the prescribed distance at less than three one-hundredths of a second, making it "too fast to avoid"¦. The effect is immediate; there is no chance to resist."

Clark's attorney insists that the officer's attack was justified in order "to gain compliance and in defense of his person." The JPX is designed to incapacitate an aggressor at a distance. Clark -- who was armed and wearing body armor -- fired it into Hernandez's temple from a distance of roughly ten inches, blowing apart her right eye and leaving the left with severe, irreparable damage.

Anyone who had undergone rudimentary training with the JPX would understand that the weapon should not be fired directly into the head or face of a non-violent suspect. Clark's actions suggest that his intention was not to gain "compliance," but rather to inflict summary street punishment for "contempt of cop."

Hernandez was taken to the hospital and never charged. Following an investigation by the Riverside County Sherriff's office, a grand jury indicted Clark on four felony charges: Assault under color of authority, assault with a less lethal weapon, use of force causing severe bodily injury, and assault with force likely to cause severe bodily injury. Free on $50,000 bail, Clark faces up to 20 years in prison. At present, the officer -- who is chairman of the local police union -- was placed on administrative leave, which is to say that he was given a paid vacation.

Interestingly, the law firm representing Clark in his criminal trial is involving in a union lawsuit against Beaumont Police Chief Frank Coe, claiming that the chief retaliated against critics on in the department by denying them promotions, thereby leaving several positions vacant.

Tragically, the blinding of Monique Hernandez arose out of a domestic disturbance that led to a 911 call. Two officers responded to the call, one of whom reportedly witnessed the assault while speaking with Hernandez's family.

It should be remembered that any time someone calls for police "assistance," he's inviting the intervention of people who consider themselves licensed to inflict potentially lethal violence as punishment for non-compliance. It should be assumed that if the police get involved, somebody is going to be needlessly injured or killed.

8 comments:

  1. An eye for an eye sounds very good for this one.

    ReplyDelete
  2. As they say in Mexico, "if you call the police because you have a problem, then you'll have two problems."

    ReplyDelete
  3. True. There is rarely any need to call a cop. When you do, you are risking your life. Let them stay where they are, eating their donuts, or arresting children for operating lemonade stands. Cops in America have very little value anymore. Stay safe.

    ReplyDelete
  4. "Tragically, the blinding of Monique Hernandez arose out of a domestic disturbance that led to a 911 call"

    IMO make sure your know what you are doing before calling 911. Often your will be getting a LOT of trouble to help you with a LITTLE trouble and the "help" will arrive far too late to be of any real help.

    Perhaps if we learn to solve our own problems pigs like Clark will find themselves out of a job. Decent police officers are NOT pigs.

    ReplyDelete
  5. It's important that people understand something very clearly-- police don't work for the you, they work for the department. So forget the "protect and serve" hoopla. In fact, there have been numerous court decisions stating that police are under no legal obligation whatsoever to protect "person or property from harm or loss".

    So what IS their duty, exactly? Simply, to generate maximum revenue via enforcement of statutes, policies, and codes falling within the UCC. No discretion, no mercy-- everything is "black or white" with these folks-- much like the color scheme of their patrol cars.

    This is why for years now they have been referred to as 'police' (aka 'policy') officers instead of 'peace' officers. This is why indictments are always shown as "THE STATE VERSUS DEFENDANT" in CAPS (one Corporation versus another) instead of the defendant vs. victim. It's also why departments are becoming increasingly militarized-- the enemy is not crime, it is YOU, the public.

    Police, judges, and lawyers pledge to protect the Constitution yet ignore its basic premises of innocence-until-proven-guilty, due process, jury by peer, and so on. Judges have veered so far from the Constitution they actively (and illegally) advise jurors they CANNOT find a defendant innocent if he/she can be shown to have violated the letter of the law-- regardless of circumstances. This is one reason why our incarceration rate is higher than anywhere else in the world, and why your freedom is much more dependent on the depth of your bank account than anything else.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I don't condone this man's actions. No one can. He will serve time in jail (if the systems decides to convict him....who knows on that right now either...as corruption is in every police and social department in the USA...or so it is beginning to feel like).

    I am as helpless to stop the violence against innocent victims as anyone else....but as an entire species...we do have all the power we need to do something.

    In the meantime, I still use 911 in my area and I still get good responses.

    So how do you know if you have responsible people in your area? Got me.

    .....
    There will come a time when we will have to go back to knowing the people we can depend on. It means everything will change. Good.

    ReplyDelete
  7. He should be castrated and blinded

    ReplyDelete
  8. This is absolutely of NO surprise to me. The Beaumont Police Department is the definition of woman hating, doughnut stuffing, lazy, good for nothing, GOOD OLD BOYS on an ego trip. I lived in Beaumont for 20 years and HAD to leave because they refused to protect me against my Ex husband even when I had a restraining order. He showed up at my house and tried to choke me. I broke free and ran to call 911. When he saw I had dialed the police he ran out of the house and down the street.

    The cops showed up and there was CLEARLY deep red marks on my neck. Did they go to his home or arrest him. NO. Since I could not give them an address they said they could not do anything. I told them I could TAKE THEM THERE. They said NO. They did not take pictures as required by law. They did not do the mandatory recheck and see the HUGE bruises the developed on my neck and all up and my sides where he grabbed me by the side as I was dropping to my knees to get away from him.

    This was not the first time they ignored him, in fact one time(the reason we divorced) he was throwing beer bottles at the cop car and they continued to drive off, knowing this man was acting nuts and there were 2 kids in the house.

    They did nothing about what he did to me and acted like all woman deserve to be beaten. Over the next 2 years he was convicted of two violent crimes. One for trying to run someone down with a car and the second for trying to kill his girl friend.

    I am a honest hard working citizen. Don't drink, Never done drugs, never committed a crime. I work hard and have done well in my career. I have always paid my taxes (a whole lot more than my ex ever will) but I am treated like a second class citizen. Sadly I use to take care of the children of at least 2 of the officers when they were young.

    I ended up having to move as far as I could get from Beaumont and changed mine and the kids name so he could not find us. Because I just don't trust the police or the courts to protect me or my children. I decided to protect myself. If he shows up this time I will not waste my time calling the police. I will use the baseball bat that sits beside my bed (still after 8 years). And of course the police will then put ME in jail for protecting myself because they refused to. But he will never be able to hurt my kids.

    The sad thing is that the same month I moved, another woman was nearly killed under almost the same circumstances. Had restraining orders and being stalked and the police refused to help. SHAME ON THE DEPARTMENT FOR MAKING A CULTURE OF GOOD OLD BOYS.

    ReplyDelete